Suppose, Contend, Differentiate

home of a sporadic blogger

Wednesday, March 30, 2011

to post

Posted by PaulRyan Time 3/30/2011 11:36:00 PM
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest

No comments:

Post a Comment

Older Post Home
Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Blog Archive

  • ▼  2011 (3)
    • ▼  March (1)
      • to post
    • ►  February (1)
    • ►  January (1)
  • ►  2010 (12)
    • ►  December (1)
    • ►  November (1)
    • ►  October (1)
    • ►  September (1)
    • ►  August (1)
    • ►  July (1)
    • ►  June (1)
    • ►  May (1)
    • ►  April (1)
    • ►  March (1)
    • ►  February (1)
    • ►  January (1)
  • ►  2009 (12)
    • ►  December (1)
    • ►  November (1)
    • ►  October (1)
    • ►  September (1)
    • ►  August (1)
    • ►  July (1)
    • ►  June (1)
    • ►  May (1)
    • ►  April (1)
    • ►  March (1)
    • ►  February (1)
    • ►  January (1)
  • ►  2008 (11)
    • ►  December (1)
    • ►  November (1)
    • ►  September (1)
    • ►  August (1)
    • ►  July (1)
    • ►  June (1)
    • ►  May (1)
    • ►  April (1)
    • ►  March (1)
    • ►  February (1)
    • ►  January (1)
  • ►  2007 (13)
    • ►  December (1)
    • ►  November (1)
    • ►  October (1)
    • ►  September (1)
    • ►  August (1)
    • ►  July (1)
    • ►  June (1)
    • ►  May (1)
    • ►  April (1)
    • ►  March (1)
    • ►  February (1)
    • ►  January (2)
  • ►  2006 (27)
    • ►  December (1)
    • ►  November (1)
    • ►  October (1)
    • ►  September (1)
    • ►  August (2)
    • ►  July (3)
    • ►  June (3)
    • ►  May (6)
    • ►  April (2)
    • ►  March (5)
    • ►  February (1)
    • ►  January (1)
  • ►  2005 (26)
    • ►  December (3)
    • ►  November (2)
    • ►  October (3)
    • ►  September (3)
    • ►  August (1)
    • ►  July (1)
    • ►  June (6)
    • ►  May (7)

now playing

The contentions, opinions, and views are constitutional based on the First Amendment. Therefore, it is reasonable to say that those views may only be categorized as intellectual calisthenics and nothing more. Accordingly, when a reader views and reads the contents of the site, the author bears no legal responsibility whatsoever to the events transpiring or not transpiring due to the usage of the point of views. As I said, this is an exercise of the First Amendment and, if the prospective reader does not agree to the terms, it is IMPERATIVE to LEAVE this site immediately.Fair Use Notice: This site may contain copyrighted material whose use has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owners. I believe that this not-for-profit use on the web constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material as provided for in section 177 of the Copyright Law. Streaming and digital rights controls are employed to protect against downloads and distribution. If you wish to use this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
Simple theme. Theme images by ranplett. Powered by Blogger.